A Comprehensive Approach to Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
A reasoning model, based on the logic of argumentation, is described. The model represents argumentation as a directed graph in which nodes and arcs can be colored using an ordinal set of weightings and in which the attributes of both nodes and arcs can be modified. It is thus able to deal with the undercutting or augmenting of arguments. Weightings can be propagated through the graph to generate unique weightings for any node or arc. The model is able to deal with contradiction. It can incorporate numerical methods and is able to handle qualitative and quantitative reasoning.
منابع مشابه
An Argumentation-based Approach to Database Repair
The access to high-quality data is essential to make accurate decisions. Consequently, when a database becomes inconsistent is crucial to restore its consistency. The main approach for database consistency restoration is based on the notion of repair. In this work, we use Argumentation techniques to provide a better understand of the reasoning process behind database reparation. We introduced a...
متن کاملOn Guidelines for Representing Business Models - A Design Science Approach
Business models describe the modus operandi of a firm and reflect the activities and value streams from an abstract viewpoint. This paper proposes a set of guidelines for the representation of business models. Based on recent conceptualizations of business models and argumentation theory, we develop a comprehensive framework for the representation of a business model’s structure and the logic o...
متن کاملArgument Construction, Argument Evaluation, And Decision-Making: A Content Analysis Of Argumentation And Debate Textbooks
ARGUMENT CONSTRUCTION, ARGUMENT EVALUATION, ANDDECISION-MAKING: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENTATION ANDDEBATE TEXTBOOKSby NEIL BUTTMay 2010Advisor: Dr. Kelly YoungMajor: CommunicationDegree: Doctor of PhilosophyCritical thinking abilities, especially the advanced critical thinking abilities required fordecision-making, are important to both individuals an...
متن کاملDeixis: A Pragmatics Analysis
Deixis owns a significant place in the study of pragmatics. Present study discusses deixis comparatively with reference to Levinson (1983) and Yule (1996) in terms of its clarification of concepts, appropriate exemplification and coherent argumentation as propounded in their respective works on pragmatics. However, it is revealed through this discussion that the approach of Yule is quite precis...
متن کاملDialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory
The notions of types of dialogue and dialectical relevance are central themes in Walton’s work and the grounds for a dialectical approach to many fallacies. After outlining the dialogue models constituting the background of Walton’s account, this article presents the concepts of dialectical relevance and dialogue shifts in their application to biased argumentation, fallacious moves, and illicit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of chemical information and computer sciences
دوره 43 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003